================================================================================ ⚡ EEG PARADOX DECODER ⚡ Clinical Pattern Detection System ================================================================================ CLINICAL NARRATIVE REPORT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject ID: anonymous Files Processed: 2 Source Files: 1. EO.edf 2. EC.edf File: EO.edf Protocol: single_paired Report Date: March 04, 2026 System Version: 1.0.4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLINICAL NARRATIVE This EEG analysis for anonymous was performed using the EEG Paradox Decoder v1.0.4 definition-based detection system. The analysis examined multiple electrode sites across key brain networks for patterns associated with various clinical conditions and normative deviations. BACKGROUND RHYTHM: CLINICAL FINDINGS: Analysis revealed 30 significant patterns after filtering and deduplication, organized across brain networks as follows: In the Frontal Network (Executive function, attention regulation, working memory): 1. At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with F3 Low Alpha (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.30). 2. At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with F3 Migraine Active Phase (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.30). 3. At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (EO) - Mild was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.30). 4. At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (EO) - Moderate was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.30). 5. At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (EO) - Severe was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.30). ... and 8 additional findings in this network. In the Central Network (Motor control, sensorimotor integration, attention): 1. At C3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with C3 Left Motor Control Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-2.84). 2. At C4 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with C4 Right Motor Control Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-2.95). In the Parietal Network (Sensory integration, spatial processing, attention): 1. At P3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P3 Left Parietal Relaxation Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.27). 2. At P4 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P4 Right Parietal Relaxation Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.26). 3. At P7 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P7 SMR Deficiency (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-3.13). 4. At P7 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P7 Left Parietal Processing Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.29). 5. At P7 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P7 Left Parietal Underarousal (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-3.49). ... and 2 additional findings in this network. In the Occipital Network (Visual processing, alpha generation): 1. At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Anxiety Risk was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-2.58). 2. At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Occipital Alpha Deficiency was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.50). 3. At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Low Theta/Beta (O1 EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-2.58). 4. At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Very Low Theta/Beta (O1 EC) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-2.58). 5. At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Occipital Alpha Suppression (PTSD/Trauma) was identified with 1.00 confidence (z=-4.50). ... and 3 additional findings in this network. GLOBAL BRAIN STATE: Vigilance state analysis indicates V0 (50.0 index) - Invalid/Unknown. Vigilance state is stable (0.00 transitions/min), indicating consistent regulation of arousal levels. CONNECTIVITY METRICS SITE-SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS Findings at individual sites that may not be captured by network-wide analysis: Alpha Sub-Band Analysis: • Cz (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Cz (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • F3 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • F3 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • O1 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • O1 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Pz (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Pz (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • P7 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • P7 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Fz (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Fz (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • C3 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • C3 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Fp2 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Fp2 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Fp1 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • Fp1 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • P4 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • P4 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • T7 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • T7 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • T8 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • T8 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • F4 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • F4 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • O2 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • O2 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • F7 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • F7 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • P8 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • P8 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • P3 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • P3 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • C4 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • C4 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • F8 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced • F8 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00) Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced Standalone Site Findings: • F3: 5 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - F3 Low Alpha (EO) - F3 Migraine Active Phase (EO) • F4: 2 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - F4 Low Alpha (EO) - F4 Migraine Active Phase (EO) • C3: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - C3 Left Motor Control Deficit (EO) • C4: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - C4 Right Motor Control Deficit (EO) • P3: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - P3 Left Parietal Relaxation Deficit (EO) • P4: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - P4 Right Parietal Relaxation Deficit (EO) • O1: 7 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - Anxiety Risk - Occipital Alpha Deficiency • O2: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - O2 Migraine Active Phase (EO) • F7: 3 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - F7 SMR Deficiency (EO) - F7 Left Frontal-Temporal Processing Deficit (EO) • F8: 3 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation without network-wide coherence anomaly. - F8 SMR Deficiency (EO) - F8 Right Frontal-Temporal Processing Deficit (EO) CLINICAL INTERPRETATION: The presence of 30 severe findings suggests significant deviation from normative patterns. These patterns warrant immediate clinical attention and correlation with presenting symptoms. Clinical Correlation Guidance: • Symptoms to assess: Attention, executive function, emotional regulation, anxiety, sleep quality, and cognitive performance • Patterns spanning multiple networks may indicate systemic regulation issues • Focal patterns in specific networks may correlate with domain-specific functional difficulties • Consider additional testing if patterns suggest structural or epileptiform abnormalities • Review z-scores and percentiles for magnitude of deviations DIRECTED CONNECTIVITY — EEG TRACEROUTE ANALYSIS ================================================================================ Signal propagation path tracing over Granger causality graphs. Each hop represents a statistically significant directed causal connection (FDR-corrected p < 0.05). Strength = Granger F-statistic. ── ALPHA BAND ── Network: 19 nodes, 98 directed edges, density 28.7% Average path length: 7.5 hops | Maximum: 11 hops | Average strength: 0.061 Recurrent circuits detected: 16 Isolated nodes (no connections): 1 Node Roles: Drivers (high outward reach): F8 Major sinks (convergence): F7 (terminus for 53% of paths) Relays (pass-through): C3, C4, Cz, F3, F4, Fp1, Fp2, Fz, O1, O2, P4, P8, Pz, T8 Isolated (disconnected): P7 Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength): 1. F8 → F7 → C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → ... (12 nodes) 11 hops | mean str 0.057 | min str 0.032 | cost 236.9 | loop_detected [LOOP] 2. C3 → F4 → P8 → O2 → P4 → C4 → Fp1 → T8 → ... (11 nodes) 10 hops | mean str 0.060 | min str 0.032 | cost 206.3 | loop_detected [LOOP] 3. F7 → C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → T8 → ... (11 nodes) 10 hops | mean str 0.060 | min str 0.034 | cost 205.2 | loop_detected [LOOP] 4. Pz → C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → T8 → ... (11 nodes) 10 hops | mean str 0.059 | min str 0.032 | cost 207.9 | loop_detected [LOOP] 5. O1 → C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → T8 → ... (11 nodes) 10 hops | mean str 0.059 | min str 0.032 | cost 209.5 | loop_detected [LOOP] Recurrent Circuits: From C3: loop at hop 10 → F7 (C3 → F4 → P8 → O2 → P4 → C4 → ...) From C4: loop at hop 9 → F7 (C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → ...) From Cz: loop at hop 8 → O2 (Cz → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → ...) From F3: loop at hop 8 → F7 (F3 → O2 → P4 → C4 → Fp1 → T8 → ...) From F4: loop at hop 9 → F7 (F4 → P8 → O2 → P4 → C4 → Fp1 → ...) Interpretation: F7 functions as a primary convergence hub in the alpha network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. Primary drivers (F8) show high outward reach, indicating these sites originate signal that propagates broadly across the network. High loop count (16) suggests significant recurrent/reverberant activity in the alpha band — may indicate thalamocortical feedback circuits. ── BETA BAND ── Network: 19 nodes, 115 directed edges, density 33.6% Average path length: 11.1 hops | Maximum: 12 hops | Average strength: 0.018 Recurrent circuits detected: 2 Node Roles: Drivers (high outward reach): C3, C4, Cz, F3, F4, F7, Fp1, Fp2, Fz, O1, P3, P4, P7, P8, Pz, T8 Major sinks (convergence): O2 (terminus for 42% of paths) Relays (pass-through): F8 Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength): 1. P7 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → O1 → Cz → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.020 | min str 0.012 | cost 683.5 | ttl_exceeded 2. O2 → O1 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → Pz → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.020 | min str 0.012 | cost 671.5 | ttl_exceeded 3. C3 → O2 → O1 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.019 | min str 0.011 | cost 708.0 | ttl_exceeded 4. F7 → F8 → F3 → O1 → C4 → P4 → O2 → P7 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.019 | min str 0.011 | cost 686.5 | ttl_exceeded 5. O1 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → Pz → O2 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.019 | min str 0.012 | cost 686.6 | ttl_exceeded Recurrent Circuits: From F8: loop at hop 6 → F8 (F8 → F3 → O1 → C4 → P4 → F7 → ...) From P3: loop at hop 12 → C4 (P3 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → ...) Interpretation: O2 functions as a primary convergence hub in the beta network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. Primary drivers (C3, C4, Cz, F3) show high outward reach, indicating these sites originate signal that propagates broadly across the network. Long average path length (11.1 hops) indicates a well-connected, broadly distributed beta network with extensive signal propagation. ── DELTA BAND ── Network: 19 nodes, 102 directed edges, density 29.8% Average path length: 11.4 hops | Maximum: 12 hops | Average strength: 0.019 Recurrent circuits detected: 9 Node Roles: Drivers (high outward reach): C3, C4, Cz, F3, F4, F7, Fp1, Fz, P3, P7, P8, Pz, T7, T8 Major sinks (convergence): O1 (terminus for 37% of paths) Relays (pass-through): F8, Fp2, O2, P4 Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength): 1. P7 → F4 → Cz → C4 → T8 → C3 → F3 → P4 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.019 | min str 0.010 | cost 706.6 | loop_detected [LOOP] 2. C4 → P7 → F4 → Cz → Fz → T8 → C3 → F3 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.009 | cost 756.2 | ttl_exceeded 3. F4 → Cz → C4 → P7 → Fp2 → O1 → O2 → F3 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.010 | cost 729.9 | ttl_exceeded 4. P3 → O1 → Fp2 → Pz → P4 → F3 → C3 → F7 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.010 | cost 722.2 | ttl_exceeded 5. T8 → C3 → F3 → P4 → Pz → Fp2 → O1 → O2 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.009 | cost 764.6 | loop_detected [LOOP] Recurrent Circuits: From Cz: loop at hop 11 → O1 (Cz → F4 → O1 → Fp2 → Pz → P4 → ...) From F3: loop at hop 12 → T8 (F3 → C3 → F7 → Fp2 → O1 → O2 → ...) From F8: loop at hop 10 → O1 (F8 → O1 → Fp2 → Pz → P4 → F3 → ...) From Fp2: loop at hop 10 → O1 (Fp2 → O1 → O2 → F3 → C3 → F7 → ...) From O1: loop at hop 9 → O1 (O1 → Fp2 → Pz → P4 → F3 → C3 → ...) Interpretation: O1 functions as a primary convergence hub in the delta network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. Primary drivers (C3, C4, Cz, F3) show high outward reach, indicating these sites originate signal that propagates broadly across the network. High loop count (9) suggests significant recurrent/reverberant activity in the delta band — may indicate thalamocortical feedback circuits. Long average path length (11.4 hops) indicates a well-connected, broadly distributed delta network with extensive signal propagation. ── GAMMA BAND ── Network: 19 nodes, 88 directed edges, density 25.7% Average path length: 2.9 hops | Maximum: 6 hops | Average strength: 0.015 Node Roles: Major sinks (convergence): Fp2 (terminus for 89% of paths) Relays (pass-through): C3, C4, F3, F4, F7, F8, Fp1, O1, O2, P3, P4, P7, P8, Pz, T7, T8 Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength): 1. T8 → T7 → P7 → O2 → F8 → F4 → Fp2 6 hops | mean str 0.013 | min str 0.009 | cost 496.6 | no_admissible_edges 2. T7 → P7 → O2 → F8 → F4 → Fp2 5 hops | mean str 0.012 | min str 0.009 | cost 439.3 | no_admissible_edges 3. P7 → T7 → F8 → F4 → Fp2 4 hops | mean str 0.015 | min str 0.009 | cost 297.1 | no_admissible_edges 4. C3 → Pz → F8 → F4 → Fp2 4 hops | mean str 0.014 | min str 0.009 | cost 325.8 | no_admissible_edges 5. P3 → O2 → F8 → F4 → Fp2 4 hops | mean str 0.011 | min str 0.009 | cost 395.8 | no_admissible_edges Interpretation: Fp2 functions as a primary convergence hub in the gamma network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. No recurrent circuits detected — gamma connectivity is predominantly feedforward. Short average path length (2.9 hops) suggests sparse or localized gamma connectivity — signal does not propagate far from its origin. ── THETA BAND ── Network: 19 nodes, 116 directed edges, density 33.9% Average path length: 11.7 hops | Maximum: 12 hops | Average strength: 0.016 Recurrent circuits detected: 10 Node Roles: Drivers (high outward reach): Cz, F3, F4, F7, F8, Fp1, Fp2, Fz, O1, O2, P3, P4, P7, P8, Pz, T7, T8 Major sinks (convergence): C3 (terminus for 53% of paths) Relays (pass-through): C4 Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength): 1. O1 → Fp1 → T8 → F7 → Pz → F8 → C4 → P8 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.011 | cost 716.9 | ttl_exceeded 2. Fp1 → T8 → F7 → Pz → F8 → C4 → P8 → O2 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.017 | min str 0.011 | cost 735.8 | ttl_exceeded 3. P8 → O2 → Cz → Fp1 → T8 → F7 → Pz → F8 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.017 | min str 0.010 | cost 742.6 | loop_detected [LOOP] 4. Pz → F7 → T8 → Fp1 → F8 → C4 → P8 → O2 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.017 | min str 0.011 | cost 736.9 | ttl_exceeded 5. F3 → Fp1 → T8 → F7 → Pz → F8 → C4 → P8 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.017 | min str 0.011 | cost 741.6 | ttl_exceeded Recurrent Circuits: From C4: loop at hop 10 → C3 (C4 → F8 → F7 → T8 → Fp1 → Cz → ...) From F4: loop at hop 12 → C3 (F4 → F8 → C4 → T8 → F7 → Pz → ...) From F8: loop at hop 11 → C3 (F8 → C4 → T8 → F7 → Pz → Fp1 → ...) From Fp2: loop at hop 12 → C3 (Fp2 → F8 → C4 → T8 → F7 → Pz → ...) From Fz: loop at hop 12 → C3 (Fz → O2 → Cz → Fp1 → T8 → F7 → ...) Interpretation: C3 functions as a primary convergence hub in the theta network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. Primary drivers (Cz, F3, F4, F7) show high outward reach, indicating these sites originate signal that propagates broadly across the network. High loop count (10) suggests significant recurrent/reverberant activity in the theta band — may indicate thalamocortical feedback circuits. Long average path length (11.7 hops) indicates a well-connected, broadly distributed theta network with extensive signal propagation. ── CROSS-BAND COMPARISON ── Band Avg Hops Avg Str Edges Loops -------------------------------------------------- alpha 7.5 0.061 98 16 beta 11.1 0.018 115 2 delta 11.4 0.019 102 9 gamma 2.9 0.015 88 0 theta 11.7 0.016 116 10 Broadest propagation: theta (11.7 avg hops) Densest connectivity: theta (116 edges) Note: Traceroute paths are derived from Granger causality (directed statistical prediction). They represent statistical information flow patterns, not direct anatomical connections. All edges passed FDR-corrected significance testing. Interactive 3D visualization available in the accompanying HTML files. CONNECTIVITY FLAGS (Anomaly / Red-Flag Summary) ================================================================================ IDS-style checks on traceroute and network metrics. Toggle overlay in interactive 3D view. -- ALPHA BAND (10 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Loop at hop 10 -> F7 (from C3) [WARNING] Loop at hop 9 -> F7 (from C4) [WARNING] Loop at hop 8 -> O2 (from Cz) [WARNING] Loop at hop 8 -> F7 (from F3) [WARNING] Loop at hop 9 -> F7 (from F4) [WARNING] Path from F8 has weak hop (min strength 0.032 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from C3 has weak hop (min strength 0.032 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from F7 has weak hop (min strength 0.034 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from Pz has weak hop (min strength 0.032 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from O1 has weak hop (min strength 0.032 < 0.15) -- BETA BAND (12 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Loop at hop 6 -> F8 (from F8) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> C4 (from P3) [INFO] Path from P7 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from P7 has weak hop (min strength 0.012 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from O2 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from O2 has weak hop (min strength 0.012 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from C3 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from C3 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from F7 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from F7 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from O1 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from O1 has weak hop (min strength 0.012 < 0.15) -- DELTA BAND (13 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Loop at hop 11 -> O1 (from Cz) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> T8 (from F3) [WARNING] Loop at hop 10 -> O1 (from F8) [WARNING] Loop at hop 10 -> O1 (from Fp2) [WARNING] Loop at hop 9 -> O1 (from O1) [WARNING] Path from P7 has weak hop (min strength 0.010 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from C4 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from C4 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from F4 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from F4 has weak hop (min strength 0.010 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from P3 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from P3 has weak hop (min strength 0.010 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from T8 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) -- GAMMA BAND (5 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Path from T8 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from T7 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from P7 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from C3 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from P3 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) -- THETA BAND (14 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Loop at hop 10 -> C3 (from C4) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> C3 (from F4) [WARNING] Loop at hop 11 -> C3 (from F8) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> C3 (from Fp2) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> C3 (from Fz) [INFO] Path from O1 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from O1 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from Fp1 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from Fp1 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from P8 has weak hop (min strength 0.010 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from Pz stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from Pz has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from F3 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from F3 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) PREDICTIVE ESCALATION MONITOR (PEM) ================================================================================ Overall Tier: Gated (tier 0) VDE — Vigilance Drop Event Horizon: 30s | Risk: 11% | Tier: Gated | Confidence: 100% Top drivers: O1, P7, F7 Evidence edges (9): O1 -> Fp1 [theta] str=0.0146 O1 -> Fp2 [theta] str=0.0146 O1 -> F3 [theta] str=0.0146 P7 -> Fp1 [theta] str=0.0128 P7 -> Fp2 [theta] str=0.0128 Interpretation: No significant escalation indicators at this time. Rule: PEM_VDE_030 v1.0.0 VDE — Vigilance Drop Event Horizon: 120s | Risk: 11% | Tier: Gated | Confidence: 100% Top drivers: O1, P7, F7 Evidence edges (9): O1 -> Fp1 [theta] str=0.0146 O1 -> Fp2 [theta] str=0.0146 O1 -> F3 [theta] str=0.0146 P7 -> Fp1 [theta] str=0.0128 P7 -> Fp2 [theta] str=0.0128 Interpretation: No significant escalation indicators at this time. Rule: PEM_VDE_120 v1.0.0 ================================================================================ Generated by EEG Paradox Decoder v1.0.4 Copyright (C) 2025 EEG Paradox Clinical System Contributors ================================================================================