Demo · Report

Vigilance-Phenotype-State Report

Vigilance state classification using a 7-state model (V0–V6), regional vigilance breakdown, stability metrics, and phenotype correlations.

Sample data only. This report is from an anonymous test run for demonstration purposes. It is not from a real client session.

Clinicians, researchers

Vigilance-Phenotype-State Report

Sample output from demo run — generated by EEG Paradox Decoder v1.0.4

VIGILANCE-PHENOTYPE-STATE CORRELATION REPORT

EEG Paradox Clinical System

Subject IDanonymous
Age/GenderNot specified, Not specified
Session DateNot specified
Report Generated2026-03-04 00:49:24
  1. 1
    GLOBAL VIGILANCE SUMMARY (7-State Model)
Dominant Vigilance StateDrowsy
Vigilance Index50.0 (0-100 scale)
Vigilance LevelV0
State Instability0.00 transitions/min

→ Low (Stable) State Stability Score: 100/100 (Highly Stable - Consistent state maintenance)

VIGILANCE STATE TIMELINE

Time0s 10s 20s

│││ State: ? ? ? ...

State Distribution
Unknown15 windows (100.0%)
  1. 1
    REGIONAL VIGILANCE STATES

Region | Dominant State | Index | Level | Contributing Sites

CentralMicrosleep41.3V30 sites
FrontalMicrosleep42.3V30 sites
OccipitalMicrosleep51.6V30 sites
ParietalMicrosleep47.7V30 sites
TemporalMicrosleep42.9V30 sites
  1. 1
    SITE-BY-SITE VIGILANCE STATES

Microsleep State Sites (19 sites):

Site | Index | Level | Confidence | Region

P752.7V30.50Unknown
O151.6V30.50Unknown
O251.6V30.50Unknown
P848.7V30.50Unknown
P347.9V30.50Unknown
P447.6V30.50Unknown
F746.4V30.50Unknown
Pz46.4V30.50Unknown
F344.3V30.50Unknown
C443.4V30.50Unknown
Fz43.4V30.50Unknown
F443.2V30.50Unknown
T843.1V30.50Unknown
T742.8V30.50Unknown
Cz40.1V30.50Unknown
F840.0V30.50Unknown
C340.0V40.50Unknown
Fp138.4V40.50Unknown
Fp237.8V40.50Unknown
  1. 1
    PHENOTYPE-STATE CORRELATION ANALYSIS
Phenotype-State Co-occurrence Matrix

Phenotype | Alert | Relaxed | Drowsy | Microsleep | Light Sleep | Deep Sleep | REM

Frontal Alpha Excess Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Frontal Alpha Heterogeneous Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Frontal Alpha Suppression Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Frontal Beta Excess Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Frontal Beta Heterogeneous Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Frontal Beta Suppression Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Frontal SMR Suppression Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Frontal Theta Excess Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Occipital Alpha Suppression Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Occipital Theta Suppression Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Temporal Alpha Excess Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Temporal Alpha Heterogeneous Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Temporal Alpha Suppression Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Temporal Beta Excess Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Temporal Beta Heterogeneous Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Temporal Beta Suppression Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Temporal SMR Suppression Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Temporal Theta Excess Pattern0.0%0.0%67.6%32.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%

Key Findings:

  • Frontal Alpha Excess Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Frontal Alpha Heterogeneous Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Frontal Alpha Suppression Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Frontal Beta Excess Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Frontal Beta Heterogeneous Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Frontal Beta Suppression Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Frontal SMR Suppression Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Frontal Theta Excess Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Occipital Alpha Suppression Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Occipital Theta Suppression Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Temporal Alpha Excess Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Temporal Alpha Heterogeneous Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Temporal Alpha Suppression Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Temporal Beta Excess Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Temporal Beta Heterogeneous Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Temporal Beta Suppression Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Temporal SMR Suppression Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  • Temporal Theta Excess Pattern:
→ Most frequently observed duringDrowsy (67.6% of occurrences)
→ Also observed duringMicrosleep (32.4%)
  1. 1
    STATE TRANSITION ANALYSIS
Total State Transitions5

Most Common Transitions:

Microsleep → Drowsy3 times ( 60.0%)
Drowsy → Microsleep2 times ( 40.0%)
  1. 1
    ENGAGEMENT OVERLAY ANALYSIS

Engagement Distribution by Vigilance State (Wake States Only):

State | Engaged | Disengaged | Neutral | Total Windows

Drowsy | 2 ( 8.0%) | 0 ( 0.0%) | 23 ( 92.0%) | 25

Key Insights:

  • Drowsy: Mixed engagement pattern
  1. 1
    CLINICAL INTERPRETATION
Vigilance StabilityStable vigilance pattern with minimal state transitions
Dominant State (Drowsy)Reduced alertness - indicates onset of drowsiness or fatigue
Phenotype-State Correlations
  • Frontal Alpha Excess Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Frontal Alpha Heterogeneous Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Frontal Alpha Suppression Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Frontal Beta Excess Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Frontal Beta Heterogeneous Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Frontal Beta Suppression Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Frontal SMR Suppression Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Frontal Theta Excess Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Occipital Alpha Suppression Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Occipital Theta Suppression Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Temporal Alpha Excess Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Temporal Alpha Heterogeneous Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Temporal Alpha Suppression Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Temporal Beta Excess Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Temporal Beta Heterogeneous Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Temporal Beta Suppression Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Temporal SMR Suppression Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

  • Temporal Theta Excess Pattern: Most active during Drowsy state

→ Suggests state-dependent expression of this phenotype

END OF REPORT

Report generated2026-03-04 00:49:24

EEG Paradox Clinical Pattern Detection System Vigilance-Phenotype-State Correlation Analysis

All outputs shown are from sample data for illustration only. EEG Paradox Solutions provides non-clinical informational services. Licensed clinicians interpret the results.