Demo · Report

Clinical Narrative Report

Prose-format narrative of findings — background rhythm description, clinical observations by network. Suitable for clinical notes or referral letters.

Back to demoDownload raw TXT
Sample data only. This report is from an anonymous test run for demonstration purposes. It is not from a real client session.

Clinicians, referring physicians

Clinical Narrative Report

Sample output from demo run — generated by EEG Paradox Decoder v1.0.4

Clinical Pattern Detection System

CLINICAL NARRATIVE REPORT

Subject IDanonymous
Files Processed2
Source Files
  1. 1
    EO.edf
  2. 2
    EC.edf
FileEO.edf
Protocolsingle_paired
Report DateMarch 04, 2026
System Version1.0.4

CLINICAL NARRATIVE

This EEG analysis for anonymous was performed using the EEG Paradox Decoder v1.0.4 definition-based detection system. The analysis examined multiple electrode sites across key brain networks for patterns associated with various clinical conditions and normative deviations.

BACKGROUND RHYTHM
CLINICAL FINDINGS

Analysis revealed 30 significant patterns after filtering and deduplication, organized across brain networks as follows:

In the Frontal Network (Executive function, attention regulation, working memory):

  1. 1
    At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with F3 Low Alpha (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-4.30
  2. 2
    At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with F3 Migraine Active Phase (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-4.30
  3. 3
    At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (EO) - Mild was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-4.30
  4. 4
    At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (EO) - Moderate was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-4.30
  5. 5
    At F3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (EO) - Severe was identified with 1.00 confidence . ... and 8 additional findings in this network.
    z=-4.30

In the Central Network (Motor control, sensorimotor integration, attention):

  1. 1
    At C3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with C3 Left Motor Control Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-2.84
  2. 2
    At C4 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with C4 Right Motor Control Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-2.95

In the Parietal Network (Sensory integration, spatial processing, attention):

  1. 1
    At P3 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P3 Left Parietal Relaxation Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-4.27
  2. 2
    At P4 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P4 Right Parietal Relaxation Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-4.26
  3. 3
    At P7 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P7 SMR Deficiency (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-3.13
  4. 4
    At P7 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P7 Left Parietal Processing Deficit (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-4.29
  5. 5
    At P7 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with P7 Left Parietal Underarousal (EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence . ... and 2 additional findings in this network.
    z=-3.49

In the Occipital Network (Visual processing, alpha generation):

  1. 1
    At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Anxiety Risk was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-2.58
  2. 2
    At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Occipital Alpha Deficiency was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-4.50
  3. 3
    At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Low Theta/Beta (O1 EO) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-2.58
  4. 4
    At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Very Low Theta/Beta (O1 EC) was identified with 1.00 confidence .
    z=-2.58
  5. 5
    At O1 (EO epoch), a severe pattern consistent with Occipital Alpha Suppression (PTSD/Trauma) was identified with 1.00 confidence . ... and 3 additional findings in this network.
    z=-4.50
GLOBAL BRAIN STATE

Vigilance state analysis indicates V0 (50.0 index) - Invalid/Unknown. Vigilance state is stable (0.00 transitions/min), indicating consistent regulation of arousal levels.

CONNECTIVITY METRICS

SITE-SPECIFIC OBSERVATIONS

Findings at individual sites that may not be captured by network-wide analysis:

Alpha Sub-Band Analysis
  • Cz (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Cz (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • F3 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • F3 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • O1 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • O1 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Pz (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Pz (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • P7 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • P7 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Fz (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Fz (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • C3 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • C3 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Fp2 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Fp2 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Fp1 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • Fp1 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • P4 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • P4 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • T7 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • T7 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • T8 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • T8 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • F4 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • F4 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • O2 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • O2 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • F7 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • F7 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • P8 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • P8 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • P3 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • P3 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • C4 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • C4 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • F8 (EO): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

  • F8 (EC): Alpha sub-bands balanced (ratio: 1.00)

Alpha sub-bands relatively balanced

Standalone Site Findings
  • F3: 5 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • F3 Low Alpha (EO)
  • F3 Migraine Active Phase (EO)
  • F4: 2 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • F4 Low Alpha (EO)
  • F4 Migraine Active Phase (EO)
  • C3: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • C3 Left Motor Control Deficit (EO)
  • C4: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • C4 Right Motor Control Deficit (EO)
  • P3: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • P3 Left Parietal Relaxation Deficit (EO)
  • P4: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • P4 Right Parietal Relaxation Deficit (EO)
  • O1: 7 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • Anxiety Risk
  • Occipital Alpha Deficiency
  • O2: 1 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • O2 Migraine Active Phase (EO)
  • F7: 3 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • F7 SMR Deficiency (EO)
  • F7 Left Frontal-Temporal Processing Deficit (EO)
  • F8: 3 finding(s) - standalone amplitude elevation

without network-wide coherence anomaly.

  • F8 SMR Deficiency (EO)
  • F8 Right Frontal-Temporal Processing Deficit (EO)
CLINICAL INTERPRETATION

The presence of 30 severe findings suggests significant deviation from normative patterns. These patterns warrant immediate clinical attention and correlation with presenting symptoms.

Clinical Correlation Guidance
  • Symptoms to assess: Attention, executive function, emotional regulation,

anxiety, sleep quality, and cognitive performance

  • Patterns spanning multiple networks may indicate systemic regulation issues
  • Focal patterns in specific networks may correlate with domain-specific

functional difficulties

  • Consider additional testing if patterns suggest structural or epileptiform

abnormalities

  • Review z-scores and percentiles for magnitude of deviations

DIRECTED CONNECTIVITY — EEG TRACEROUTE ANALYSIS

Signal propagation path tracing over Granger causality graphs. Each hop represents a statistically significant directed causal connection (FDR-corrected p < 0.05). Strength = Granger F-statistic.

── ALPHA BAND ──

Network19 nodes, 98 directed edges, density 28.7%
Average path length7.5 hops | Maximum: 11 hops | Average strength: 0.061
Recurrent circuits detected16
Isolated nodes (no connections)1
Node Roles
Drivers (high outward reach)F8
Major sinks (convergence)F7 (terminus for 53% of paths)
Relays (pass-through)C3, C4, Cz, F3, F4, Fp1, Fp2, Fz, O1, O2, P4, P8, Pz, T8
Isolated (disconnected)P7

Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength):

  1. 1
    F8 → F7 → C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → ... (12 nodes) 11 hops | mean str 0.057 | min str 0.032 | cost 236.9 | loop_detected [LOOP]
  2. 2
    C3 → F4 → P8 → O2 → P4 → C4 → Fp1 → T8 → ... (11 nodes) 10 hops | mean str 0.060 | min str 0.032 | cost 206.3 | loop_detected [LOOP]
  3. 3
    F7 → C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → T8 → ... (11 nodes) 10 hops | mean str 0.060 | min str 0.034 | cost 205.2 | loop_detected [LOOP]
  4. 4
    Pz → C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → T8 → ... (11 nodes) 10 hops | mean str 0.059 | min str 0.032 | cost 207.9 | loop_detected [LOOP]
  5. 5
    O1 → C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → T8 → ... (11 nodes) 10 hops | mean str 0.059 | min str 0.032 | cost 209.5 | loop_detected [LOOP]
Recurrent Circuits
From C3loop at hop 10 → F7 (C3 → F4 → P8 → O2 → P4 → C4 → ...)
From C4loop at hop 9 → F7 (C4 → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → ...)
From Czloop at hop 8 → O2 (Cz → P4 → O2 → P8 → F4 → Fp1 → ...)
From F3loop at hop 8 → F7 (F3 → O2 → P4 → C4 → Fp1 → T8 → ...)
From F4loop at hop 9 → F7 (F4 → P8 → O2 → P4 → C4 → Fp1 → ...)
Interpretation

F7 functions as a primary convergence hub in the alpha network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. Primary drivers (F8) show high outward reach, indicating these sites originate signal that propagates broadly across the network. High loop count (16) suggests significant recurrent/reverberant activity in the alpha band — may indicate thalamocortical feedback circuits.

── BETA BAND ──

Network19 nodes, 115 directed edges, density 33.6%
Average path length11.1 hops | Maximum: 12 hops | Average strength: 0.018
Recurrent circuits detected2
Node Roles
Drivers (high outward reach)C3, C4, Cz, F3, F4, F7, Fp1, Fp2, Fz, O1, P3, P4, P7, P8, Pz, T8
Major sinks (convergence)O2 (terminus for 42% of paths)
Relays (pass-through)F8

Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength):

  1. 1
    P7 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → O1 → Cz → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.020 | min str 0.012 | cost 683.5 | ttl_exceeded
  2. 2
    O2 → O1 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → Pz → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.020 | min str 0.012 | cost 671.5 | ttl_exceeded
  3. 3
    C3 → O2 → O1 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.019 | min str 0.011 | cost 708.0 | ttl_exceeded
  4. 4
    F7 → F8 → F3 → O1 → C4 → P4 → O2 → P7 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.019 | min str 0.011 | cost 686.5 | ttl_exceeded
  5. 5
    O1 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → Pz → O2 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.019 | min str 0.012 | cost 686.6 | ttl_exceeded
Recurrent Circuits
From F8loop at hop 6 → F8 (F8 → F3 → O1 → C4 → P4 → F7 → ...)
From P3loop at hop 12 → C4 (P3 → C4 → P4 → F7 → F8 → F3 → ...)
Interpretation

O2 functions as a primary convergence hub in the beta network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. Primary drivers (C3, C4, Cz, F3) show high outward reach, indicating these sites originate signal that propagates broadly across the network. Long average path length (11.1 hops) indicates a well-connected, broadly distributed beta network with extensive signal propagation.

── DELTA BAND ──

Network19 nodes, 102 directed edges, density 29.8%
Average path length11.4 hops | Maximum: 12 hops | Average strength: 0.019
Recurrent circuits detected9
Node Roles
Drivers (high outward reach)C3, C4, Cz, F3, F4, F7, Fp1, Fz, P3, P7, P8, Pz, T7, T8
Major sinks (convergence)O1 (terminus for 37% of paths)
Relays (pass-through)F8, Fp2, O2, P4

Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength):

  1. 1
    P7 → F4 → Cz → C4 → T8 → C3 → F3 → P4 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.019 | min str 0.010 | cost 706.6 | loop_detected [LOOP]
  2. 2
    C4 → P7 → F4 → Cz → Fz → T8 → C3 → F3 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.009 | cost 756.2 | ttl_exceeded
  3. 3
    F4 → Cz → C4 → P7 → Fp2 → O1 → O2 → F3 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.010 | cost 729.9 | ttl_exceeded
  4. 4
    P3 → O1 → Fp2 → Pz → P4 → F3 → C3 → F7 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.010 | cost 722.2 | ttl_exceeded
  5. 5
    T8 → C3 → F3 → P4 → Pz → Fp2 → O1 → O2 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.009 | cost 764.6 | loop_detected [LOOP]
Recurrent Circuits
From Czloop at hop 11 → O1 (Cz → F4 → O1 → Fp2 → Pz → P4 → ...)
From F3loop at hop 12 → T8 (F3 → C3 → F7 → Fp2 → O1 → O2 → ...)
From F8loop at hop 10 → O1 (F8 → O1 → Fp2 → Pz → P4 → F3 → ...)
From Fp2loop at hop 10 → O1 (Fp2 → O1 → O2 → F3 → C3 → F7 → ...)
From O1loop at hop 9 → O1 (O1 → Fp2 → Pz → P4 → F3 → C3 → ...)
Interpretation

O1 functions as a primary convergence hub in the delta network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. Primary drivers (C3, C4, Cz, F3) show high outward reach, indicating these sites originate signal that propagates broadly across the network. High loop count (9) suggests significant recurrent/reverberant activity in the delta band — may indicate thalamocortical feedback circuits. Long average path length (11.4 hops) indicates a well-connected, broadly distributed delta network with extensive signal propagation.

── GAMMA BAND ──

Network19 nodes, 88 directed edges, density 25.7%
Average path length2.9 hops | Maximum: 6 hops | Average strength: 0.015
Node Roles
Major sinks (convergence)Fp2 (terminus for 89% of paths)
Relays (pass-through)C3, C4, F3, F4, F7, F8, Fp1, O1, O2, P3, P4, P7, P8, Pz, T7, T8

Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength):

  1. 1
    T8 → T7 → P7 → O2 → F8 → F4 → Fp2 6 hops | mean str 0.013 | min str 0.009 | cost 496.6 | no_admissible_edges
  2. 2
    T7 → P7 → O2 → F8 → F4 → Fp2 5 hops | mean str 0.012 | min str 0.009 | cost 439.3 | no_admissible_edges
  3. 3
    P7 → T7 → F8 → F4 → Fp2 4 hops | mean str 0.015 | min str 0.009 | cost 297.1 | no_admissible_edges
  4. 4
    C3 → Pz → F8 → F4 → Fp2 4 hops | mean str 0.014 | min str 0.009 | cost 325.8 | no_admissible_edges
  5. 5
    P3 → O2 → F8 → F4 → Fp2 4 hops | mean str 0.011 | min str 0.009 | cost 395.8 | no_admissible_edges
Interpretation

Fp2 functions as a primary convergence hub in the gamma network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. No recurrent circuits detected — gamma connectivity is predominantly feedforward. Short average path length (2.9 hops) suggests sparse or localized gamma connectivity — signal does not propagate far from its origin.

── THETA BAND ──

Network19 nodes, 116 directed edges, density 33.9%
Average path length11.7 hops | Maximum: 12 hops | Average strength: 0.016
Recurrent circuits detected10
Node Roles
Drivers (high outward reach)Cz, F3, F4, F7, F8, Fp1, Fp2, Fz, O1, O2, P3, P4, P7, P8, Pz, T7, T8
Major sinks (convergence)C3 (terminus for 53% of paths)
Relays (pass-through)C4

Dominant Propagation Chains (greedy, ranked by length and strength):

  1. 1
    O1 → Fp1 → T8 → F7 → Pz → F8 → C4 → P8 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.018 | min str 0.011 | cost 716.9 | ttl_exceeded
  2. 2
    Fp1 → T8 → F7 → Pz → F8 → C4 → P8 → O2 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.017 | min str 0.011 | cost 735.8 | ttl_exceeded
  3. 3
    P8 → O2 → Cz → Fp1 → T8 → F7 → Pz → F8 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.017 | min str 0.010 | cost 742.6 | loop_detected [LOOP]
  4. 4
    Pz → F7 → T8 → Fp1 → F8 → C4 → P8 → O2 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.017 | min str 0.011 | cost 736.9 | ttl_exceeded
  5. 5
    F3 → Fp1 → T8 → F7 → Pz → F8 → C4 → P8 → ... (13 nodes) 12 hops | mean str 0.017 | min str 0.011 | cost 741.6 | ttl_exceeded
Recurrent Circuits
From C4loop at hop 10 → C3 (C4 → F8 → F7 → T8 → Fp1 → Cz → ...)
From F4loop at hop 12 → C3 (F4 → F8 → C4 → T8 → F7 → Pz → ...)
From F8loop at hop 11 → C3 (F8 → C4 → T8 → F7 → Pz → Fp1 → ...)
From Fp2loop at hop 12 → C3 (Fp2 → F8 → C4 → T8 → F7 → Pz → ...)
From Fzloop at hop 12 → C3 (Fz → O2 → Cz → Fp1 → T8 → F7 → ...)
Interpretation

C3 functions as a primary convergence hub in the theta network, receiving signal from multiple propagation chains. This is consistent with regional network convergence patterns. Primary drivers (Cz, F3, F4, F7) show high outward reach, indicating these sites originate signal that propagates broadly across the network. High loop count (10) suggests significant recurrent/reverberant activity in the theta band — may indicate thalamocortical feedback circuits. Long average path length (11.7 hops) indicates a well-connected, broadly distributed theta network with extensive signal propagation.

── CROSS-BAND COMPARISON ──

Band Avg Hops Avg Str Edges Loops

alpha 7.5 0.061 98 16 beta 11.1 0.018 115 2 delta 11.4 0.019 102 9 gamma 2.9 0.015 88 0 theta 11.7 0.016 116 10

Broadest propagationtheta (11.7 avg hops)
Densest connectivitytheta (116 edges)
NoteTraceroute paths are derived from Granger causality (directed statistical

prediction). They represent statistical information flow patterns, not direct anatomical connections. All edges passed FDR-corrected significance testing. Interactive 3D visualization available in the accompanying HTML files.

CONNECTIVITY FLAGS (Anomaly / Red-Flag Summary)

IDS-style checks on traceroute and network metrics. Toggle overlay in interactive 3D view.

-- ALPHA BAND (10 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Loop at hop 10 -> F7 (from C3) [WARNING] Loop at hop 9 -> F7 (from C4) [WARNING] Loop at hop 8 -> O2 (from Cz) [WARNING] Loop at hop 8 -> F7 (from F3) [WARNING] Loop at hop 9 -> F7 (from F4) [WARNING] Path from F8 has weak hop (min strength 0.032 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from C3 has weak hop (min strength 0.032 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from F7 has weak hop (min strength 0.034 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from Pz has weak hop (min strength 0.032 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from O1 has weak hop (min strength 0.032 < 0.15)

-- BETA BAND (12 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Loop at hop 6 -> F8 (from F8) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> C4 (from P3) [INFO] Path from P7 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from P7 has weak hop (min strength 0.012 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from O2 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from O2 has weak hop (min strength 0.012 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from C3 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from C3 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from F7 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from F7 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from O1 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from O1 has weak hop (min strength 0.012 < 0.15)

-- DELTA BAND (13 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Loop at hop 11 -> O1 (from Cz) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> T8 (from F3) [WARNING] Loop at hop 10 -> O1 (from F8) [WARNING] Loop at hop 10 -> O1 (from Fp2) [WARNING] Loop at hop 9 -> O1 (from O1) [WARNING] Path from P7 has weak hop (min strength 0.010 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from C4 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from C4 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from F4 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from F4 has weak hop (min strength 0.010 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from P3 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from P3 has weak hop (min strength 0.010 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from T8 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15)

-- GAMMA BAND (5 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Path from T8 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from T7 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from P7 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from C3 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from P3 has weak hop (min strength 0.009 < 0.15)

-- THETA BAND (14 flag(s)) -- [WARNING] Loop at hop 10 -> C3 (from C4) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> C3 (from F4) [WARNING] Loop at hop 11 -> C3 (from F8) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> C3 (from Fp2) [WARNING] Loop at hop 12 -> C3 (from Fz) [INFO] Path from O1 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from O1 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from Fp1 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from Fp1 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [WARNING] Path from P8 has weak hop (min strength 0.010 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from Pz stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from Pz has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15) [INFO] Path from F3 stopped by TTL (max hops reached) [WARNING] Path from F3 has weak hop (min strength 0.011 < 0.15)

PREDICTIVE ESCALATION MONITOR (PEM)

Overall TierGated (tier 0)

VDE — Vigilance Drop Event

Top driversO1, P7, F7
Evidence edges (9)

O1 -> Fp1 [theta] str=0.0146 O1 -> Fp2 [theta] str=0.0146 O1 -> F3 [theta] str=0.0146 P7 -> Fp1 [theta] str=0.0128 P7 -> Fp2 [theta] str=0.0128 Interpretation: No significant escalation indicators at this time. Rule: PEM_VDE_030 v1.0.0

VDE — Vigilance Drop Event

Top driversO1, P7, F7
Evidence edges (9)

O1 -> Fp1 [theta] str=0.0146 O1 -> Fp2 [theta] str=0.0146 O1 -> F3 [theta] str=0.0146 P7 -> Fp1 [theta] str=0.0128 P7 -> Fp2 [theta] str=0.0128 Interpretation: No significant escalation indicators at this time. Rule: PEM_VDE_120 v1.0.0

Generated by EEG Paradox Decoder v1.0.4 Copyright (C) 2025 EEG Paradox Clinical System Contributors

More in Clinical Reports

Clinical Summary

Clinicians

Master Clinical

Clinicians

Clinical Hypothesis

Clinicians, psychologists

Classical qEEG

Clinicians, referring physicians

Comprehensive

Clinicians, researchers

Printable Summary

Clinicians, clients

All outputs shown are from sample data for illustration only. EEG Paradox Solutions provides non-clinical informational services. Licensed clinicians interpret the results.